
| Element | Reporting arrangements |
|---|---|
| Solicitor-General | A |
| Administrative Appeals Tribunal | B |
| Administrative Review Council | B |
| Australasian Centre for Policing Research | C |
| Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity | B |
| Australian Crime Commission | B |
| Australian Customs Service | B |
| Australian Federal Police | B |
| Australian Government Solicitor | B |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | B |
| Australian Institute of Police Management | C |
| Australian Law Reform Commission | B |
| Australian Security Intelligence Organisation | B |
| Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre | B |
| Classification Board | B |
| Classification Review Board | B |
| Copyright Tribunal of Australia | D |
| Criminology Research Council | B |
| CrimTrac | B |
| Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal | D |
| Family Court of Australia | B |
| Family Law Council | B |
| Federal Court of Australia | B |
| Federal Magistrates Court of Australia | B |
| High Court of Australia | B |
| Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission | B |
| Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia | B & E |
| National Capital Authority | B |
| National Crime Statistics Unit | C |
| National Institute of Forensic Science | C |
| National Native Title Tribunal | B |
| Office of Parliamentary Counsel | B |
| Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions | B |
Key:
A Although resourced by the Attorney-General’s Department, the Solicitor-General is independent of the Department. The Solicitor-General does not report formally to Parliament.
B Separate reports from these bodies are tabled in Parliament.
C Reports on activities covered by the Annual Report on administration and activities of national common police services.
D Administrative support for these tribunals is provided by the various Federal Court registries. Information about these bodies can be found in the Annual Report of the Federal Court of Australia.
E The Attorney-General is required by paragraph 12(1)(d) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 to report to Parliament on the operation of the Act.
The roles and functions of the Attorney-General’s Department have changed since the 2007–08 Budget due to the Administrative Arrangements Order (AAO) of 3 December 2007.
The administrative and policy functions transferred to the Department under the AAO and established under the new Outcome 3, assisting regions to manage their own futures, in the Department with effect from 24 January 2008 were:
Output 3.1: Administration of Territories—Jervis Bay Territory, the Territory of Cocos (Keeling) Islands, the Territory of Christmas Island, the Coral Sea Island Territory, the Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands, and Commonwealth responsibilities on Norfolk Island, and the constitutional development of the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, and
Output 3.2: Natural disaster relief and mitigation in the form of financial assistance to States and Territories.
The policy and administrative functions transferred from the Department under the AAO with effect from 10 January 2008 were:
Output 1.3 (part): Privacy and freedom of information.
In addition, since the 2007–08 Budget, the functions and resources of the former Office of Film and Literature Classification were transferred to the Department (1 July 2007). The transfer of resources from the Department to the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity was completed. There has been no change to the performance information apart from price.
This functional statement is published to meet the requirements of section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
The Department’s statement is set out below, followed by those of the Copyright Tribunal, Solicitor-General and Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal (none of which publishes its own Annual Report). Agencies publishing their own Annual Reports are listed at Appendix 1. FOI statistics for the Department and all portfolio agencies are set out in the Attorney-General’s latest annual report to the Parliament on the operation of the FOI Act, which is available at www.pmc.gov.au/foi.
The Department was one of the original departments established at Federation in 1901.
The organisational chart (Figure 1, pages 10–11) shows the structure of the Department.
The broad functions of the Department are described in Chapter 3. Legislation administered by the Attorney-General is published in the Administrative Arrangements Order, which is available at www.pmc.gov.au/docs/aao.cfm.
A variety of bodies, through their association with the Department, enable people or organisations outside the Commonwealth administration to be involved in the policy making functions of the Department or in its administration of various schemes and enactments.
Examples of such bodies are:
Accessible Public Transport National Advisory Committee
Administrative Review Council
Admiralty Rules Committee
Anti-Money Laundering Assistance Team Strategic Priorities Reference Group
Anti-Money Laundering Council
Attorney-General’s Non-Government Organisation Forum on Domestic Human Rights
Attorney-General’s Non-Government Organisation on Domestic Human Rights
(25 peak human rights bodies)
Australia–New Zealand Crime Prevention Senior Officers’ Group
Australia and New Zealand Police Advisory Agency
Australian Bureau of Statistics
Australian Federation of Disability Organisations
Australian Institute of Criminology Board of Management
Australian Institute of Family Studies
Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration
Australian National Council on Drugs
Banking and Finance Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
Biannual Ministerial Meeting with Financial Institutions
Board of the Australian Crime Commission
Building Access Policy Committee
Business–Government Advisory Group on National Security
Critical Infrastructure Protection Futures Expert Advisory Group
Criminology Research Council
CrimTrac Board of Management
Critical Infrastructure Advisory Council
Emergency Management Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
Family Law Council
Family Relationship Services Australia
Firearms Policy Working Group
Intellectual Property Enforcement Consultative Group
Interception Consultative Committee
Intergovernmental Committee on Drugs
Intergovernmental Committee on the Australian Crime Commission
International Legal Services Advisory Council
Law Council of Australia
Law Enforcement Advisory Committee
Mass Gatherings Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
Model Criminal Law Officers Committee
National Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committee
National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council
National Committee for Critical Infrastructure Protection
National Corrective Services Statistics Unit Board and Advisory Group
National Crime Statistics Unit Board and Advisory Group
National Criminal Courts Statistics Unit Board and Advisory Group
National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund
National Identity Security Coordination Group
National Judicial College of Australia
National Legal Aid
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council
National Peak Overseas Adoption Support Group
National Pro Bono Resource Centre
National Roundtable on People Trafficking
National Working Group on the Prevention of the Diversion of Precursor Chemicals
into Illicit Drug Manufacture
Native Title Consultative Forum
Personal Property Securities Review Consultative Group
Relationships Australia
Sporting Shooters and Firearms Advisory Council
Water Services Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
The following categories of documents are held by the Department:
Many documents held by the Department are available free of charge upon request. Others are publicly available for purchase.
Subject to certain exceptions, the FOI Act also provides persons with a legally enforceable right of access to documents held by the Department.
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to any document held by the Department should be directed to:
The Director
Freedom of Information Section
Attorney-General’s Department
Robert Garran Offices
National Circuit
BARTON ACT 2600
Telephone: (02) 6250 5693
Facsimile: (02) 6250 5982
The Copyright Tribunal of Australia was established by the Copyright Act 1968.
Section 138 of the Copyright Act provides for a Copyright Tribunal consisting of a President and such number of Deputy Presidents and other members as are appointed.
The jurisdiction of the Tribunal can be summarised as follows:
The Tribunal maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents held by the Tribunal should be forwarded to:
The Registrar
Copyright Tribunal
Level 16
Law Courts Building
Queens Square
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Telephone: (02) 9230 8567
Facsimile: (02) 9230 8535
The office of Solicitor-General was established under the Law Officers Act 1964.
The Solicitor-General is the Second Law Officer of the Commonwealth (the Attorney-General is the First Law Officer).
The Solicitor-General is a holder of public office to whom administrative services are provided by the Attorney-General’s Department.
The Law Officers Act sets out the functions of the office, which include acting as counsel for the Commonwealth, giving opinions on questions of law to the Attorney-General, and carrying out such other functions, ordinarily performed by counsel, as the Attorney-General requests.
The Solicitor-General maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents should be directed to:
Director
Freedom of Information Section
Attorney-General’s Department
Robert Garran Offices
National Circuit
BARTON ACT 2600
Telephone: (02) 6250 5693
Facsimile: (02) 6250 5982
The Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal was established under the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955.
The Tribunal consists of a President, Deputy President and members. It has a Registrar and Deputy Registrars, as required. The principal office of the Tribunal is located in Canberra. The Registrar of the Tribunal is located in Melbourne.
Pursuant to the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955, the Tribunal can hear appeals as against conviction, prescribed acquittal and punishment in respect of prosecutions before the Australian Military Court. Further, pursuant to recent amendments to the Act, the Tribunal can also hear questions of law referred to it by the Director of Military Prosecutions.
The Tribunal maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents held by the Tribunal should be forwarded to:
Federal Court of Australia
Registry (ACT)
Nigel Bowen Commonwealth Law Courts Building
Level 1, Childers Street
CANBERRA ACT 2600
Telephone: (02) 6267 0566
Facsimile: (02) 6267 0625
OR
Federal Court of Australia
Registry (VIC)
Owen Dixon Commonwealth Law Courts Building
Level 9, 305 William Street
MELBOURNE VIC 3000
Telephone: (03) 8600 3504
Facsimile: (03) 8600 3522
The Attorney-General’s Department Service Charter and associated complaints handling policy have been in operation since June 1998. The Department’s charter is supplemented by charters covering International Child Abduction, Child Support and Civil Procedure (ICACSCP) and the Trade Measures Review Officer (TMRO).
Apart from the departmental areas covered by their own specific service charter, the Attorney-General’s Department has limited direct dealings with members of the public. The Department serves the Government and, through it, the people of Australia.
The departmental and ICACSCP charters can be viewed on the Department’s home page at www.ag.gov.au. The TMRO charter can be viewed at www.ag.gov.au/tmro. All the Department’s charters are available to clients in hard copy.
The following table sets out the customer service standards contained in each charter and the extent to which they were met during 2007–08.
| Charter | Service standard | Compliance with service standard |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney-General’s Department | A reply in plain English within 28 days of receipt of complaint, including the name and telephone number of the person dealing with the complaint. | All complaints were responded to within the stated timeframe of 28 days. The Department investigated and finalised three formal complaints against it. |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | Complied | |
| Work will be undertaken with care, diligence and sensitivity to the needs of clients. | Complied | |
| Strong commitment to accountability and continuous improvement. | Complied | |
| Clients will be treated with courtesy, fairness and respect. | Complied | |
| Staff will act responsively to client needs. | Complied | |
| International Child Abduction, Child Support and Civil Procedure | Reply within 28 days of receipt of complaint. | Complied with in all cases but one. In that case the time frame was not complied with as the matter was before the court. |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | Complied | |
| Correspondence to be a well-considered reply in plain English and to include the name and telephone number of the person dealing with the complaint. | Complied with in all cases but one. In that case the time frame was not complied with as the matter was before the court. | |
| Subject to caseload priorities, staff will act promptly for clients. | Complied | |
| Clients will be treated with courtesy, fairness and respect. | Complied | |
| Clients will be referred to the appropriate body if staff cannot help. | Complied | |
| Trade Measures Review Officer (TMRO) | Professional and independent TMRO, ensuring that reviews are conducted in a timely, accurate and fair manner. | No complaints were received against the TMRO |
| Provision of as much access as possible to the review process, ensuring that all interested parties are given the opportunity to have their views considered. | Public notices were published in The Australian newspaper. | |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | Complied | |
| Provision of accurate, concise and well considered responses in plain English to written correspondence. | Complied | |
| Generally, a written reply within 28 days of receiving the client’s letter will be provided. Alternatively, an interim response outlining the delay and when the client can expect a response will be provided. | Complied | |
| Correspondence will include the name and telephone number of the TMRO. | Complied |
Clients of the Department and those of the ICACSCP and TMRO can make a complaint or provide feedback in writing, via email, by telephone or in person. Staff of the Department, whenever possible, are encouraged to resolve complaints immediately. In those instances where a resolution cannot be reached at the time of the complaint, the complaint systems for all three charters require the recording of the following information for investigation and appropriate action:
Contracting for a consultancy service is a prominent activity no different in principle from the procurement of other property and services. The requirements of the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines and the Chief Executive’s Instructions are relevant. Additionally, departmental CEI’s states that the agreement of the Secretary is required for all consultancies of $20,000 or more.
Consultancy services are assessed by determining whether the services meet the criteria of a consultancy as set out in the Department of Finance and Deregulation’s Financial Management Guidance No.15. The assessment process distinguishes between consultancy and non-consultancy contracts, taking into account their respective characteristics. These characteristics represent an amalgam of those commonly exhibited across the diverse range of consultancy and non-consultancy arrangements.
In considering these characteristics, the Department focused on the following two questions, to determine the nature of the agreement:
Details of contractors—for example those engaged through employment agencies for short-term relief or other purposes—are not included in this report.
In accordance with the Requirements for annual reports for departments, executive agencies and FMA Act bodies, detailed information relating to new consultancy contracts to the value of $10,000 or more (inclusive of GST) is provided in Table 11.
During 2007–08, 34 new consultancy contracts were entered into, involving total actual expenditure of $882,418. In addition, 15 ongoing consultancy contracts were active during the year involving total actual expenditure of $675,137.
| Consultant name | Description | Contract price ($) | Selection process1 | Justification2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A S Blunn | Review of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 | 33,000 | Direct sourcing | C |
| Analytics Group Pty Ltd | Review of National Counter-Terrorism Committee Special Fund | 12,100 | Direct sourcing | A |
| Broadleaf Capital International Pty Ltd | Risk assessment of the Prevention, Diversion, Rehabilitation and Restorative Justice Program and its administration | 20,405 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Courage Partners Pty Ltd | Review of performance reporting in the Department | 10,780 | Direct sourcing | C |
| CPT Global Limited | Conduct Gate 5 of the AusCheck gateway review | 35,758 | Direct sourcing | B,C |
| Cultural Partners Australia (NSW) Pty Ltd | Provide cultural advice on the appropriateness of the mainstream campaign and the translation of the campaign creative materials for phase 3 of the National Security Campaign | 132,000 | Select tender | B |
| Des Semple & Associates | Review of the delivery of family law services | 33,000 | Direct sourcing | A |
| Des Semple & Associates | Review funding of Family Court of Western Australia | 33,000 | Direct sourcing | A |
| Dr Theodor Krauthammer | Peer review, modelling and simulation testing | 50,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Galaxy DP Pty Ltd | Conduct independent market research on classification and community standards | 79,585 | Direct sourcing | C |
| Insight SRC Pty Ltd | Conduct the Departmental Staff Survey 2008 | 90,420 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Jakeman Business Solutions Pty Ltd | Develop an Operational Response Capability Sub-Committee Interim Training Framework | 19,800 | Select tender | B |
| John Walker Crime Trends Analysis | Review of Indigenous Legal Aid Program—Funding Allocation Model | 16,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| KPMG | Conduct a threat risk assessment | 23,587 | Panel | B |
| KPMG | Conduct a threat risk assessment | 17,905 | Panel | B |
| KPMG | Conduct an environment vulnerability assessment | 15,950 | Panel | B |
| KPMG | Conduct a threat risk assessment | 21,750 | Panel | B |
| Malcolm S Pascoe | Develop, explain and refine funding model for distribution of Commonwealth Community Legal Services Program funds and update Legal Aid funding distribution model | 75,490 | Direct sourcing | B |
| MAXimusSolutions Australia | Review of financial management framework program | 22,275 | Panel | C |
| Monash University | Literature Review: Older children, children with special needs, and intercountry adoption 1990 to present | 10,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Oakton AA Services Pty Ltd | Provide an ICT security threat and risk assessment for the National Document Verification Service | 52,206 | Panel | B |
| Oakton AA Services Pty Ltd | Provide advice relating to the recommendations for the ICT security threat and risk assessment for the National Document Verification Service | 112,284 | Panel | B |
| Oakton AA Services Pty Ltd | Provide advice relating to the recommendations for the ICT security threat and risk assessment for the National Document Verification Service | 133,305 | Panel | B |
| Peter Ford Consultancy Pty Ltd | Select legal opinions provided to the Commonwealth between 1923 and 1945, suitable for publication as containing continuing legal and/or historical interest | 11,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Planning for People Pty Ltd | Provide Tourism Master Plan for Christmas Island | 17,600 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Professor Chris Cunneen | Review of Indigenous Legal Aid research paper | 10,000 | Direct sourcing | C |
| Quality Management Solutions | Conduct a departmental internal investigation | 19,000 | Direct sourcing | C |
| RTO Strategic Development Solutions | Redevelop Emergency Management Australia Education and Training Evaluation System | 20,446 | Open tender | B |
| Salinger Consulting Pty Ltd | Conduct a privacy impact assessment for the AusCheck scheme | 31,416 | Direct sourcing | B,C |
| Stratsec.Net Pty Ltd | IT security review of Network Operations Centre | 12,342 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Stratsec.Net Pty Ltd | IT security review of 3–5 National Circuit Barton | 19,602 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Success Works Pty Ltd | Conduct a risk assessment of the Family Violence Prevention Legal Service and its administration | 80,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| The University of Queensland | Review and update of the Rehabilitation of Mined Land Task register for Christmas Island | 108,185 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Urbis Pty Ltd | Conduct a demographic survey of the Indian Ocean Territories | 79,268 | Open tender | B |
Explanation of selection process terms:
Open tender: A request for tender is published widely and all submissions received before the deadline are accepted from any potential suppliers who satisfy the conditions for participation.
Select tender: An invitation to tender is issued to potential suppliers from a short list.
Direct sourcing: A form of restricted tendering in which an agency may invite a potential supplier or suppliers of its choice to make a submission because of their expertise and/or their special ability to supply the goods and/or services sought.
Panel: An invitation to tender is issued to a panel of potential suppliers (who have pre-qualified) established by the agency to supply to the Government.
Justification for decision to use consultancy:
A—skills currently unavailable within agency
B—need for specialised or professional skills
C—need for independent research or assessment
Under section 311A of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 the Department is required to disclose payments of $10,500 or more (inclusive of GST) to specific types of organisations. These organisations are advertising agencies, market research organisations, polling organisations, media advertising organisations, and direct mail organisations.
There were no payments during 2007–08 to direct mail organisations or polling organisations. Details of payments to the other categories of organisations are set out below.
| Name of organisation | Payment ($) | Purpose | Key |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adcorp Australia Limited | 22,396 | Non-campaign government advertising | C |
| Gatecrasher Advertising Pty Ltd | 41,120 | Advertising for community education campaign of family law reforms | A |
| HMA Blaze | 459,770 | Non-campaign government advertising | C |
| Open Mind Research Group | 61,435 | Market research for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism campaign development | B |
| Universal McCann | 218,076 | Media for bushfire awareness campaign | C |
| Di Marzio Research | 155,320 | Market research for National Security Campaign | B |
| Publicis Mojo | 436,050 | Advertising production for National Security Campaign | A |
| Universal McCann | 11,978,578 | Media buy for the National Security Campaign | C |
| Colmar Brunton Social Research Pty Ltd | 66,005 | Communications research testing effective wording and delivery of emergency warnings for culturally and linguistically diverse and remote indigenous communities, including for tsunami | B |
Key:
A Paid to a creative advertising agency to develop advertising campaign
B Paid to a market research organisation
C Paid to a media advertising organisation for placing government advertising (both campaign and non-campaign) in the media
All departments and agencies are required, under paragraph 11.1(ba) of the Legal Services Directions 2005, to report on their legal services expenditure each financial year. A breakdown of the Department’s expenditure for 2007–08 is set out below, along with the previous year’s data for comparison.
All expenditure figures include GST.
| 2006–07 | 2007–08 | |
|---|---|---|
| Total legal services expenditure1 | $8,240,262 | $9,652,441 |
| Total external legal services expenditure2 | $7,048,838 | $9,011,918 |
| External expenditure on solicitors | $5,672,721 | $7,640,940 |
| External expenditure on counsel | $1,376,117 | $1,370,978 |
| Number of male counsel briefed | 26 | 37 |
| Value of briefs to male counsel | $894,253 | $993,148 |
| Number of female counsel briefed | 12 | 18 |
| Value of briefs to female counsel | $481,864 | $377,830 |
| Internal legal services expenditure3 | $1,191,424 | $640,523 |
These figures exclude amounts of legal services expenditure relating to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, the United Nations Convention on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance and international obligations under various bilateral maintenance arrangements. These are recorded separately because they do not constitute the purchase of legal services by the Department for itself. Rather, they arise because the Department pays for legal services that benefit other parties as a result of obligations under international agreements.
These figures do not include expenditure related to the Clarke Inquiry into the case of Dr Mohamed Haneef.
The Department does not have a separate internal legal services branch. Within the Department, there are units that provide both internal and external services, principally the Office of International Law and the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing. Legal services are provided at no cost to the areas of the Department receiving the services. There is no billing arrangement for internal legal services, and separate records of expenditure are not kept. Such expenses are treated as part of the aggregate of staffing costs for the Department.
An estimate of the cost of internal legal services has been derived from an assessment of the number of staff involved in providing internal legal services and the proportion of their time involved in providing those services. The staff of the Office of International Law devoted to providing internal legal services are the full-time equivalent of 0.5 of an APS Level 3, 0.75 Legal Officer (0.5 in 2006–07), 1.0 Senior Legal Officer, 0.75 Principal Legal Officer (0.5 in 2006–07) and 0.5 of an SES Officer. The staff of the Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing devoted to providing internal legal services are the full-time equivalent of 0.2 of a Legal Officer, 1.0 Senior Legal Officer, 0.4 of a Principal Legal Officer and 0.1 of an SES Officer. Internal legal services that may be provided from time to time by other areas of the Department are not sufficiently material to enable separate costing.
The cost of internal legal services is estimated based on salary levels for these positions and increased by a factor reflecting typical staffing and other overheads within the Department.
By this method, it is estimated that the Department’s internal legal services expenditure was approximately $0.641 million 2007–08 and $1.191 million in 2006–07.
The costs of the Solicitor-General and Counsel Assisting the Solicitor-General (including salary) are also met by the Department.
The tables on the following pages show staffing details for the Department at 30 June 2007 and at 30 June 2008 by each classification level.
| Gender | ACT | NSW | Vic | Qld | SA | WA | NT | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APS Level 1–2 | Female | 15.56 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 16.56 |
| Male | 11.02 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.02 | |
| Graduate | Female | 42.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42.00 |
| Male | 13.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13.00 | |
| APS Level 3 | Female | 77.00 | 3.00 | 3.83 | 0 | 0 | 0.80 | 0 | 84.63 |
| Male | 17.29 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.29 | |
| APS Level 3–4 | Female | 3.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 |
| Male | 5.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.00 | |
| APS Level 4 | Female | 84.24 | 6.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 90.24 |
| Male | 24.80 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.80 | |
| APS Level 4–5 | Female | 7.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.00 |
| Male | 13.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.00 | |
| APS Level 5 | Female | 97.32 | 3.00 | 3.60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 104.92 |
| Male | 32.45 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35.45 | |
| APS Level 5–6 | Female | 16.40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16.40 |
| Male | 15.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15.90 | |
| APS Level 6 | Female | 124.83 | 3.00 | 9.03 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 139.86 |
| Male | 50.00 | 9.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | 0 | 65.00 | |
| Legal Officer | Female | 62.73 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 62.73 |
| Male | 26.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26.00 | |
| Executive Level 1 | Female | 143.65 | 2.52 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 1.85 | 155.02 |
| Male | 112.39 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 0 | 126.39 | |
| Senior Legal Officer | Female | 74.15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74.15 |
| Male | 28.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.00 | |
| Executive Level 2 | Female | 44.49 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.49 |
| Male | 64.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 68.00 | |
| Principal Legal Officer | Female | 54.95 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54.95 |
| Male | 29.80 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29.80 | |
| SES Band 1 | Female | 27.30 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.30 |
| Male | 30.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.00 | |
| SES Band 2 | Female | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.00 |
| Male | 9.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.00 | |
| SES Band 3 | Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | |
| Total | Female | 882.62 | 20.52 | 23.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3.80 | 3.85 | 936.25 |
| Male | 483.65 | 18.00 | 15.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 8.00 | 0 | 527.65 |
| Gender | ACT | NSW | Vic | Qld | SA | WA | NT | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| APS Level 1–2 | Female | 12.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.05 |
| Male | 11.32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 13.32 | |
| Graduate | Female | 24.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.00 |
| Male | 10.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10.00 | |
| APS Level 3 | Female | 68.78 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.00 | 0 | 74.78 |
| Male | 14.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 15.00 | |
| APS Level 3–4 | Female | 4.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 5.00 |
| Male | 4.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | |
| APS Level 4 | Female | 76.69 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.69 |
| Male | 30.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.68 | |
| APS Level 4–5 | Female | 6.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 7.00 |
| Male | 8.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.00 | |
| APS Level 5 | Female | 89.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 3.6 | 0 | 93.82 |
| Male | 21.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 0 | 24.90 | |
| APS Level 5–6 | Female | 12.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.00 |
| Male | 11.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.50 | |
| APS Level 6 | Female | 92.60 | 2.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.03 | 0 | 101.63 |
| Male | 52.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 3.0 | 1.00 | 58.00 | |
| Legal Officer | Female | 76.64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.64 |
| Male | 27.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.00 | |
| Executive Level 1 | Female | 108.92 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 7.00 | 0 | 121.92 |
| Male | 108.75 | 3.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 121.75 | |
| Senior Legal Officer | Female | 63.38 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63.38 |
| Male | 24.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.00 | |
| Executive Level 2 | Female | 38.89 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 41.89 |
| Male | 54.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 | 0 | 55.00 | |
| Principal Legal Officer | Female | 44.76 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44.76 |
| Male | 28.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28.50 | |
| SES Band 1 | Female | 22.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22.44 |
| Male | 31.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31.00 | |
| SES Band 2 | Female | 11.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.00 |
| Male | 10.00 | 1.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.00 | |
| SES Band 3 | Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 4.00 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4.00 | |
| Total | Female | 751.37 | 7.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 26.63 | 0.00 | 790.00 |
| Male | 450.65 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 15.00 | 2.00 | 477.65 |
| Gender | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time | ||||
| APS Level 1–2 | Female | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 20 | |
| Male | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 16 | ||
| Graduate | Female | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | |
| Male | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | ||
| APS Level 3 | Female | 47 | 8 | 29 | 4 | 88 | |
| Male | 11 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 21 | ||
| APS Level 3–4 | Female | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | |
| Male | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | ||
| APS Level 4 | Female | 66 | 7 | 19 | 0 | 92 | |
| Male | 17 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 27 | ||
| APS Level 4–5 | Female | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | |
| Male | 12 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 14 | ||
| APS Level 5 | Female | 95 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 108 | |
| Male | 32 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 36 | ||
| APS Level 5–6 | Female | 15 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 17 | |
| Male | 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 17 | ||
| APS Level 6 | Female | 125 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 142 | |
| Male | 62 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 65 | ||
| Legal Officer | Female | 56 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 64 | |
| Male | 19 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 26 | ||
| Executive Level 1 | Female | 136 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 161 | |
| Male | 122 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 126 | ||
| Senior Legal Officer | Female | 65 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 79 | |
| Male | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28 | ||
| Executive Level 2 | Female | 43 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 47 | |
| Male | 65 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 68 | ||
| Principal Legal Officer | Female | 45 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 59 | |
| Male | 25 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 30 | ||
| SES Band 1 | Female | 26 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 29 | |
| Male | 29 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 30 | ||
| SES Band 2 | Female | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | |
| Male | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | ||
| SES Band 3 | Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Male | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Total | Female | 783 | 91 | 81 | 13 | 968 | |
| Male | 470 | 9 | 48 | 6 | 533 | ||
| Gender | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time | ||||
| APS Level 1–2 | Female | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 14 | |
| Male | 12 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14 | ||
| Graduate | Female | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | |
| Male | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | ||
| APS Level 3 | Female | 45 | 4 | 26 | 1 | 76 | |
| Male | 10 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 15 | ||
| APS Level 3–4 | Female | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | |
| Male | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | ||
| APS Level 4 | Female | 53 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 79 | |
| Male | 17 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 31 | ||
| APS Level 4–5 | Female | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Male | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | ||
| APS Level 5 | Female | 74 | 9 | 13 | 2 | 98 | |
| Male | 20 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 25 | ||
| APS Level 5–6 | Female | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| Male | 9 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 12 | ||
| APS Level 6 | Female | 88 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 104 | |
| Male | 51 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 58 | ||
| Legal Officer | Female | 64 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 78 | |
| Male | 25 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 27 | ||
| Executive Level 1 | Female | 102 | 15 | 8 | 1 | 126 | |
| Male | 114 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 122 | ||
| Senior Legal Officer | Female | 56 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 67 | |
| Male | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | ||
| Executive Level 2 | Female | 37 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 43 | |
| Male | 53 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 55 | ||
| Principal Legal Officer | Female | 38 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 48 | |
| Male | 23 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 29 | ||
| SES Band 1 | Female | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 23 | |
| Male | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 31 | ||
| SES Band 2 | Female | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 11 | |
| Male | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | ||
| SES Band 3 | Female | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Male | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
| Total | Female | 641 | 63 | 100 | 11 | 815 | |
| Male | 423 | 8 | 47 | 2 | 480 | ||
The Department values and fosters a work environment of achievement, and recognises individuals and teams who have demonstrated excellence in achieving outcomes above and beyond expectations. To acknowledge and show appreciation for the outstanding contributions of staff, the Department has in place both formal awards and informal mechanisms that distinguish and support good performance.
Individuals and teams were recognised for their outstanding professional contribution in 2007–08. The Secretary commended the recipients for their role in highlighting the Department’s excellent work and in being a source of inspiration to other staff.
The departmental awards are:
Individual divisions administer less formal recognition awards within the Department. A number of these awards were presented during this reporting period.
The recipients of awards for 2007–08 and their noteworthy achievements follow.
John Boersig, Assistant Secretary, Indigenous Law and Justice Branch, was awarded the Public Service Medal in the Queen’s Birthday Honours announced on 9 June 2008. The award was for outstanding public service in the delivery of law and justice services to Indigenous Australians.
Sue Pidgeon, Assistant Secretary, Family Pathways Branch, was awarded the Public Service Medal in the Australia Day Honours announced on 26 January 2008. The award was for outstanding service in the development and implementation of a range of government-funded services (in particular, Family Relationship Centres across Australia) that assist families build stronger relationships or assist those who are affected by family separation.
Bronwyn Young—in recognition of outstanding effort and dedication to ensuring that speeches for the Attorney-General, the Ministers and the Department are delivered on time and written to a consistently high standard.
Alex Webling and Patrick Drake-Brockman—for superior achievement in coordinating the review of the E-security National Agenda and for excellence in building a consensus in support of a strong funding base and a lead agency role for the Attorney-General’s Department.
Julie Atwell—in recognition of her outstanding work in developing new international legal instruments to address emerging threats to civil aviation, and as Special Rapporteur to a Special Subcommittee of the International Civil Aviation Organization on that matter.
Joanna Weller—in recognition of her outstanding work in organising the Asia–Pacific Regional Meeting on the work of the Hague Conference on Private International Law, held in Sydney in June 2007.
Jenny Buchan—in recognition of her significant leadership, particularly in project governance of the financial management framework program and her contribution to the achievement of significant outcomes for the Department’s internal financial management framework.
Lynne McDonald—in recognition of her outstanding and dedicated performance in managing OH&S and rehabilitation issues for the Department.
James Allen, Amy Chang, Katrina Locke, David O’Brien, Sarah Orton, and Steve Sanders, Financial Services Group and Classification, Legal Services and Native Title Division—for planning and delivering outcomes to achieve the successful financial integration of the Office of Film and Literature Classification into the Department.
Lucinda Atkinson, Counter-Terrorism, Strategic Policy Unit—for efficient, cooperative, unfailingly polite management of the Group’s incoming government briefing arrangements.
Nils Baumgartner, Colin Minihan, and Wanni Teo, Information Law Branch—for the professional and successful organisation and conduct of the data protection seminars run in conjunction with APEC 2007.
Jodie Bijorac, Secure Services Branch—for exceptional management in delivering Stage 1 of the Secure Gateway Project.
Matthew Branford, Frances Brown, Trevor Given, Bronwyn Leslie and Sue Walker, AusCheck Implementation Team—for demonstrating high levels of professionalism and commitment in implementing the AusCheck service.
Anne Burr, Carolyn McLachlan, and Eve Wilson, Payroll Team—for excellent performance in managing the transition of the administration of employment conditions and payroll function from the Office of Film and Literature Classification to the Attorney-General’s Department.
Shannon Cuthbertson, Susanna Ford, Ashleigh McDonald , Lisa O’Connell, and Tracey Smith, Mutual Assistance and Extradition Branch—for professional and diligent work on three significant extradition cases in 2007.
Meg Dixon-Child, Mark Godfrey, Tim Hainsworth, Tony Pead, and Sally Webster, Annual Report Production Team—for dedication and commitment in producing the Department’s Annual Report 2006–07.
Kathleen Falko, Jing-Ting Chan, Susie Davis, Ingrid Nemeth, Ruvani Panagoda, and Samantha Patterson, Intercountry Adoption Branch—for outstanding work and dedication to the continuing implementation of the Overseas Adoption in Australia report recommendations.
Catherine Fitch, Rebecca Godfrey, and Szabina Horvath, Northern Territory Emergency Response Team—for their effective efforts in coordinating the Department’s involvement in the response.
Vicky Green, Information and Communications Technology Branch—for leadership, professionalism and dedication in providing information and communications technology services to the whole-of-government initiative Continuity of Government.
Rachael Jackson, Ministerial and Parliamentary Services—for dedication and commitment in producing the incoming government brief 2007.
Joan Jardine, Sabrena King, Simone Marks, Wendy Spicer, and Philippa Vickery, Community Legal Services Program team—for outstanding work in completing the 2007 Review of the Community Legal Services Program.
Glenda Kelly, Family Pathways Branch—for effective and timely implementation of the Family Dispute Resolution Register.
Kerin Leonard and Roxane Nolan, Office of International Law—for professionalism and dedication to improving Australia’s reporting under human rights treaties.
Raewyn Miners and Neil Price, Telecommunications and Surveillance Law Branch—for demonstrated high levels of professionalism and commitment in the successful development and hosting of the National Telecommunications Conference 2007.
Katherine Reimers, Executive Adviser to the Secretary—for achieving excellence in the discharge of her duties as Executive Adviser to the Secretary.
Dane Varkevisser, Information Law and Human Rights Division—for a professional response to the demands of preparing the statistics for the 2006–07 FOI Annual Report.
Andrew Warnes, Mutual Assistance and Extradition Branch—for leadership and dedication in the development of the Mutual Assistance and Extradition (MAX) Database.
Kathleen Falko, Intercountry Adoption Branch—for outstanding academic and work achievements. Kathleen’s achievements, which include a Master of Law, are a model of excellence for the Department in its pursuit of the highest quality outcomes.
Sara Goldsworthy, National Security Policy Branch—for outstanding academic and work achievements. Sara’s achievements, which include a Master of Arts in International Relations (honours) provide a model of excellence for the Department in its pursuit of the highest quality outcomes.
Kathy Hilgert, Emergency Management Australia (Mount Macedon, Victoria)—received the Attorney-General’s Department’s Women’s Network Award 2007–08 for her role in achieving exceptional outcomes for the Department, including through her involvement in the Department’s Business Managers’ Forum and participation on cross-divisional tender panels. Kathy is also recognised for her significant work in raising staff morale, mentoring her team and defending the interests of others in the workplace.
Heather Moss, Assistant Manager, Protective Security Coordination Centre—received the Attorney General’s Department’s Women’s Network Award 2007–08 for her key role in supporting the shift in how counter-terrorism capability is considered and developed across Australia and for the strong support she gives to her colleagues, both professionally and personally.
This report is presented in accordance with the requirements of section 74 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991.
The Department has a number of written Health and Safety Management Arrangements, as required under section 16 of the OH&S Act. These policy documents, together with a range of topic-specific health and safety Employee Relation Advices, are available to employees electronically through the Department’s intranet and are promoted in HR Matters, the newsletter produced by the Human Resources Branch.
The Department seeks to provide a healthy and safe work environment for all employees, contractors and visitors, and promotes the integration of prevention activities into day-to-day business.
The Health and Safety Committee met half yearly, and the minutes of its meetings were made available to employees via the Department’s intranet. Ten new health and safety representatives were appointed to the Committee in 2007–08.
| Section 68 occurrences (Notification and reporting of accidents and dangerous occurrences) |
There were 10 notifications under s 68 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 45 directions (Power to direct that workplace, etc not be disturbed) |
No directions were given to the Department under s 45 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 29 notices (Provisional improvement notices) |
No notices were issued under s 29 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 30 notices (Duties of employers in relation to health and safety representatives) |
No notices were issued under s 30 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 41 investigations (Investigations addressing compliance and possible breaches) |
No notices were issued under s 41 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 46 notices (Power to issue prohibition notices) |
No notices were issued under s 46 of the OH&S Act. |
| Section 47 notices (Power to issue improvement notices) |
No notices were issued under s 47 of the OH&S Act |
The Department continued to conduct regular workplace inspections during 2007–08. Reports were provided to division heads outlining recommendations and improvements. There was continued improvement across the Department, with divisions displaying an ongoing commitment to eliminating OH&S hazards. Employees’ awareness of OH&S has increased, resulting in improved prevention of, and early intervention for, workplace injuries and illnesses.
Major activities completed in 2007–08 included:
| Performance indicator | Performance measure | Current level of performance 2007–08 | Goals for 2008–09 | Actions for 2008–09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New or revised policy/program proposals assess impact on the lives of people with disabilities prior to decision. | Percentage of new or revised policy/program proposals that document that the impact of the proposal was considered prior to the decision making stage. | The review of the Commonwealth Community Legal Services Program (CLSP) was released for consultation purposes. The review allowed the impact of any proposals which may affect people with disabilities to be considered by the Disability Discrimination Act Legal Service providers funded under the Program. Performance measure=100% |
Any proposed changes to the CLSP arising from the review will consider the impact on people with disabilities prior to implementation. | Continue ongoing consultation on the review to ensure that any impact of proposals on people with disabilities are identified. |
| The Human Rights Branch continued to play a significant role in providing policy advice to assist in ensuring that departmental and government initiatives, legislation, policies and programs promote access, accommodate the needs of people with disabilities and do not discriminate against people with disabilities, and also that consultation occurs, where possible, directly with people with disabilities. |
| Performance indicator | Performance measure | Current level of performance 2007–08 | Goals for 2008–09 | Actions for 2008–09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| People with disabilities are included in consultation about new or revised policy/program proposals | Percentage of consultations about new or revised policy/program proposals that are developed in consultation with people with disabilities. | Disability representatives attended the second meeting of the National Forum on Emergency Warnings to the Community and participated in discussions on issues affecting them directly in relation to emergency alerts and warnings. | To continue to share information and promote ’best effort’ as the means of improving the dissemination of emergency alerts and warnings to the community, particularly to those with disabilities. | Increase disability sector representation and provide hearing loops, and Auslan interpreters, at meetings. Highlight the needs of people with disabilities in formal papers on the dissemination of emergency warnings to the community. Foster networks between emergency management and disability sectors, and promote the needs of people with disabilities at relevant conferences and meetings on emergency alerts and warnings. |
| The review of the Commonwealth Community Legal Services Program included input, through the National Association of Community Legal Centres, from community legal centres specialising in the provision of Disability Discrimination Act Legal Services to the community. Performance Measure=100% |
Consultation plans are developed taking account of the need to include community legal centres providing services to people with disabilities. | Any consultations on new or revised policy/program proposals will include community legal centres providing services to people with disabilities. | ||
| Disability groups have also been invited to make submissions to and have been consulted by the five-year review of the Transport Standards, being conducted by Allen Consulting. The report of the review will be submitted to the Attorney-General and the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government in the coming year. Representatives from disability peak groups were among the 36 NGOs that attended the 16th Attorney-General’s NGO Forum on Domestic Human Rights held in Canberra on 10 June 2008. UN Disabilities Convention The Department’s work on the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities involved comprehensive consultations with the disability sector. Following active participation during the negotiations of the text of the Convention, the disability sector played a central role in Australia’s ratification process. From January to March 2008, the Department consulted the disability sector, along with other NGOs, industry stakeholders and the broader community, on how ratification of the Convention will impact on Australia. That consultation informed a National Interest Analysis that recommended ratification and which was tabled in Parliament on 4 June 2008. |
| Performance indicator | Performance measure | Current level of performance 2007–08 | Goals for 2008–09 | Actions for 2008–09 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public announcements of new, revised or proposed policy/program initiatives are available in accessible formats* for people with disabilities in a timely manner. | Percentage of new, revised or proposed policy/program announcements available in a range of accessible formats. | 100% of announcements made by the Family Pathways Branch were made available in summary form in accessible electronic formats, including html. | 25% of announcements to be made available in at least one accessible non-electronic format. 100% of people requesting information in accessible non-electronic formats will be advised of the expected delivery date of their preferred format within 14 days of the request. |
As part of its Family Relationship Services Program communication activities, Family Pathways Branch will develop and put in place guidelines for producing materials for the program in non-electronic accessible formats. |
| The report of the review of the Commonwealth Community Legal Services Program is available in hard copy and on the internet. Performance measure for electronic formats=100% |
Appropriate publication formats to be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the target audience. | In the event that any publications are developed, consideration is given to releasing these in formats suitable to the target audience. | ||
| The Department ensured that the consultation and announcements relating to the UN Disabilities Convention were available in accessible electronic formats, and provided contact details to ensure that further adjustments could be requested. The consultation documentation also included a plain English version of the Convention. The Department also ensured that its annual NGO Human Rights Forum is accessible to promote maximum stakeholder engagement, offering sign language interpreters and hearing loops, and providing ramps. |
||||
| Time taken in providing announcements in accessible formats. | No publications were made available in non-electronic accessible formats Braille (p.m. = 0%) Audio cassette (p.m. = 0%) Large print (p.m. = 0%) No public announcements included Auslan interpreters (p.m. = 0%) No requests were received for alternative formats. |
* Accessible formats include electronic formats such as ASCII (or .txt) files and html for the web. Non-electronic formats include Braille, audiocassette, large print and easy English. Other ways of making information accessible include video captioning and Auslan interpreters.
| 2007–08 | |
| Requests carried forward | 25 |
| New requests made | 15 |
| Requests granted | 14 |
| Requests withdrawn | 1 |
| Requests refused | 0 |
| Requests otherwise discontinued | 3 |
| Requests continuing | 22 |
| Country | Number |
|---|---|
| Canada | 1 |
| Costa Rica | 1 |
| Cuba | 1 |
| Greece | 1 |
| Malta | 1 |
| Thailand | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 2 |
| United States of America | 5 |
| Country | Number |
|---|---|
| Australia | 8 |
| Costa Rica | 1 |
| Indonesia | 1 |
| Iraq | 1 |
| Lebanon | 1 |
| Malta | 1 |
| People’s Republic of China | 1 |
| South Africa | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States of America | 1 |
| Note: Three of the above citizens were dual Australian citizens |
| Child sex offences | 1 |
| Drugs | 4 |
| Assault | 1 |
| Murder | 3 |
| Theft and/or fraud | 2 |
| People smuggling | 1 |
| Company offences | 3 |
| Country | Number |
|---|---|
| Canada | 2 |
| India | 1 |
| Indonesia | 3 |
| Malaysia | 1 |
| Mexico | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Philippines | 1 |
| South Africa | 1 |
| South Korea | 3 |
| Thailand | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| United States of America | 3 |
| Vietnam | 1 |
| 2007–08 | |
|---|---|
| Requests carried forward | 45 |
| New requests received | 12 |
| Requests granted | 9 |
| Requests withdrawn | 2 |
| Requests refused by the Attorney-General | 1 |
| Requests refused by the courts | 0 |
| Requests otherwise discontinued | 4 |
| Requests continuing | 41 |
| Country | Number |
|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 |
| Croatia | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 3 |
| United States of America | 3 |
| Country | Number |
|---|---|
| Australia | 3 |
| Belgium | 1 |